Jones. Nel 1983 ha ottenuto un Oscar alla carriera. Dopo anni di inattività è tornato sul set cinematografico nel 1999 con Babe va in città. Caruso. Una pellicola che gi ai suoi tempi era stata per promossa da astute tecniche di marketing e poteva vantarsi di un cast d A partire dall giovane e bellissima Angelina Jolie (che stava cavalcando l del successo dopo la strepitosa performance da girl interrupeted), a Kiefer Sutherland per finire con l ed enigmatico Ethan Hawke. Il thriller in questione si rivela essere abbastanza esile di per se e discreto..

La bella attrice genovese nega di aver interpretato questo film, ma ci sono prove tangibili che una delle attrici senza veli è proprio lei. [.]Il vero lancio nel mondo della celluloide però è merito niente meno che di Federico Fellini che vede Carmen e la vuole per una porticina ne La città delle donne (1980). Il seno di Carmen Russo non poteva passare inosservato agli occhi esperti del Maestro che sceglie Carmen dopo un provino insieme a molte altre ragazze prosperose.

Smithsonian Mag (2017)The poor lamb clearly needs an iron for those trousers. The Sun (2016)He is a bit of a sacrificial lamb. Times, Sunday Times (2015)Use a couple of forks to pull the lamb meat into shreds. Although some who think along these lines will allow that human individuals whom they regard as yet persons deserve a certain limited respect by virtue of the purely biological fact that they are living members of the human species, they nevertheless insist that humans do not possess a right to life that precludes them from being killed to benefit others or to advance the interests of society at large.Only those human beings who have achieved and retain what are regarded as the defining attributes of personhood whether those are considered to be detectable brain function, self awareness, or immediately exercisable capacities for characteristically human mental functioning possess a right to life.The trouble with this position is that it makes nonsense of our political, philosophical, and, for many of us, theological commitment to the principle that all human beings are equal in fundamental worth and dignity.It generates puzzles that simply cannot be resolved, such as the puzzle as to why this or that accidental quality which most human beings eventually acquire in the course of normal development but others do not, and which some retain and others lose, and which some have to a greater degree than others, should count as the criterion ofThe superior position, surely, is that human beings possess equally an intrinsic dignity that is the moral ground of the equal right to life of all. This is a right possessed by every human being simply by virtue of his or her humanity. It does not depend on an individual age, or size, or stage of development; nor can it be erased by an individual physical or mental infirmity or condition of dependency.It is what makes the life of even a severely retarded child equal in fundamental worth to the life of a Nobel prize winning scientist.